Skip to main content
· 4/7/2014

United States v. Carlos Dominguez-Maroyoqui

Citations

  • 748 F.3d 918
  • 2014 WL 1344472
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 6350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that § 111(a) is not a “crime of violence” for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 because “a defendant may be convicted of violating section 111 if he or she uses any force whatsoever against a federal officer” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • holding that § 111(a) is not a “crime of violence” for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 because “a defendant may be convicted of violating section 111 if he or she uses any force whatsoever against a federal officer” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • identifying three Section 111 offenses under a prior but substantially similar version of the statute
  • assault statute criminalizing “any force whatsoever against a federal officer” does not categorically require “violent force capable of causing physical pain or injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farris, Smith, Watford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.