United States v. Carlos Arcentales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying former Rule 16(a) as though it required the disclosure of oral statements to officers now required under Rule 16(a)
• applying former Rule 16(a) as though it required the disclosure of oral statements to officers now required under Rule 16(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).