United States v. Carlos Antonio Gomez-Osorio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• presuming that, “[l]ogically,” we should apply deferential review in assessing “whether the required factual foundation exists”
• stating that there really is no conflict and that, on the specific question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a theory of defense, “the court should apply an abuse 102 USA V. EHMER of discretion standard of review”
• trial court's determination on issue whether required factual foundation existed to warrant particular jury instruction reviewed only for abuse of discretion
• knowledge supported by defendant's previous six entries into the United States and warning posters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).