United States v. Carlos A. Sanclemente-Bejarano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under Fed. Rule Crim. Proc. 11 court advice about eligibility for parole is not required before minimum sentence date carries a de jure effect and Constitutionally-protected interest. Cf. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 106 S.Ct. 366, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985
• rejecting similar contention by the defendant in that case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).