United States v. Carlan D. Hodges

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fact that defendant “took possession of [the stolen guns] with [the minor’s] assistance” was enough for § 3B1.4 enhancement to apply
• “Without any testimony of particular prior bad acts [the defendant] participated in as a gang member, we find that evidence of his mere affiliation with the gang does not fall under Rule 404(b).”
• setting forth elements for receiving stolen firearms under § 922(j)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).