Skip to main content
· 1/11/2007

United States v. Carl William Pursley, Jr.

Citations

  • 474 F.3d 757
  • 99 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 419
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 547
  • 2007 WL 64833

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e look to the elements of the two crimes for which [the defendant] was convicted to determine whether a double jeopardy violation exists.”
  • “To establish prejudice, a defendant must point to a ‘specific trial right’ that was compromised or show the jury was ‘prevent[ed] ... from making a reliable judgment about guilt - 38 - or innocence.’” (quoting Zafiro v. United States, 506 U.S. 534, 539 (1993))
  • “To establish prejudice, a defendant must point to a ‘specific trial right’ that was compromised or show the jury was ‘prevent[ed] ... from making a reliable judgment about guilt - 38 - or innocence.’” (quoting Zafiro v. United States, 506 U.S. 534, 539 (1993))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Anderson, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.