United States v. Carl W. Raetzsch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there must be some independent indicia of the likely merit of petitioner’s contentions; mere contradiction of the statements made at the guilty plea proceeding will not suffice
• holding that there must be independent indicia of the likely merit of the petitioner’s contentions; mere contradiction of the statements made at the guilty plea proceeding will not suffice
• requiring independent indicia of the likely merit of the petitioner's contentions; mere contradiction of the statements made at the guilty plea proceeding will not suffice
• defendant not entitled to evidentiary hearing when allegations are inconsistent with his conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).