United States v. Carl Victor Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where trial judge indicated that she watched subject juror closely and was convinced that juror was not asleep, \Rlhe conduct of the juror in open court was a matter of which the trial court had judicial knowledge and could take judicial notice\
• concluding that where trial judge indicated that she watched subject juror closely and was convinced that juror was not asleep, \Rlhe conduct of the juror in open court was a matter of which the trial court had judicial knowledge and could take judicial notice\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).