United States v. Carl O. Ludwig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “prejudicial error” where the case did “not present an isolated incident on the subject of improper personal injection of government counsel in the course of argument”
• \[I]nherent in the officer's statement that he smelled marihuana is the claim that he is familiar with that substance's odor.\
• \[I]nherent in the officer's statement that he smelled marihuana is the claim that he is familiar with that substance's odor.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).