United States v. Carl Lutz Wieschenberg and Carl John Heiser, III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring proof of specific intent to sustain conviction of conspiracy to commit a specific intent crime
• refusing to find conspiracy when mere discussions were susceptible to an interpretation of either legal or illegal activity
• \[T]he government must prove that the defendants agreed to and specifically intended to export without a license [a restricted item].\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).