United States v. Carl J. Warneke, Harvey E. Powers, and Allen J. McVay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pretrial detention is remedial, not punitive
• stating in dicta that the “analytical approach employed in Kurth Ranch . . . was jettisoned in Hudson” but ultimately holding that Kurth Ranch did not apply to the case at issue
• expressing “deep[ ] concern! ]” about seventeen months of pretrial detention
• “if the tax had been levied prior to the drug prosecution, the Supreme Court would then have had to determine whether the taxing procedure resulted in the attachment of jeopardy”
• “Pretrial detention does not trigger the attachment of ‘jeopardy’ so as to invoke the protection of the Double Jeopardy Clause. And, the statute authorizing pretrial detention, 18 U.S.C. § 3142, is remedial, not punitive.” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).