United States v. Carl J. London

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indictment for concealment of material fact by “trick, scheme, or device” not insufficient for failure to specify the precise trick, scheme, or device allegedly used
• “The test is not whether the indictment might have been drawn with greater certainty and exactitude, but rather whether it set forth the elements of the offense charged and sufficiently apprised defendants of the charges.”
• “[C]oncealment must be accomplished in a particular way: by a ‘trick, scheme, or device.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).