United States v. Carl Hillstrom, Henry Keppel, Loren Stockton, Leonard Stockton, Richard Darrow and Robert Savko

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• safety inspection, and seizure of marijuana in plain view during that inspection, not invalid because suggested by DEA agent, who suspected drugs might be on board
• safety inspection, and seizure of marijuana in plain view during that inspection, not invalid because suggested by DEA agent, who suspected drugs might be on board
• prior suspicion of presence of drugs does not taint the validity of a documents and safety inspection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).