United States v. Carl D. Ellis, (d.c.crim.no. 95-Cr-00435-4). United States of America v. Ester L. Carter Ester Carter, (d.c.crim.no. 95-Cr-00435-5)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no abuse of discretion where district court limited cross-examination of agent whose direct testimony was limited to authenticating tape recordings despite defendant's claim that witness had bias to avoid criminal 22 prosecution
• statements are admissible pursuant to Rule 801(d)(2)(E) even if the basis for admission is a conspiracy different from the one charged
• applying \factually intertwined\ test to determine relevance of 801(d)(2)(E) evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).