Skip to main content
· 12/7/1973

United States v. Carl A. Benson

Citations

  • 487 F.2d 978

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claim that witness’s memory faded due to 34-month delay insufficient to establish prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLAUGHLIN, Rosenn, Van Dusen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.