Skip to main content
· 10/13/2009

United States v. Carell

Citations

  • 681 F. Supp. 2d 874
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95841
  • 2009 WL 3335031

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations should be denied if any issues of fact are involved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiseman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.