United States v. Cardinas Garcia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting an inherent incredibility argument where the witness frequently saw the defendant at the stash house and nothing impeded his ability to observe the defendant’s actions
• testimony regarding previous drug sales by defendant held admissible to prove defendant’s intent to distribute other drugs in his possession
• “We accept at face value the jury's credibility determinations and its balancing of conflicting evidence.”
• “We presume jurors will conscientiously follow the trial court’s instructions” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).