United States v. Capler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Ilhnois’ crime of unlawful restraint is a crime of violence within the meaning of § 4B1.2(a)(2)
• concluding that Illinois’ crime of unlawful restraint is a crime of violence within the meaning of the residual clause
• concluding that Illinois’ crime of unlawful restraint is a crime of violence within the meaning of § 18 4B1.2(a)(2)
• reasoning that \the decision that controls the outcome of this appeal\ \survived\ intervening Supreme Court authority and, more specifically, that the decision's \analysis is in harmony with the present-day approach of the Supreme Court\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).