· 1/2/1991

United States v. Cantral Lester Eargle, Jr.

Citations

921 F.2d 56
67 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 559
1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 121
1991 WL 55

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that supplemental instructions are not “viewed in a 9 Case: 24-50282 Document: 64-1 Page: 10 Date Filed: 08/08/2025 No. 24-50282 vacuum”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Davis, Barksdale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.