United States v. Camilo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the review of a district court's legal interpretation of the Guidelines is de novo
• noting congressional rejection of Guidelines amendments that would have eliminated disparity
• rule of lenity not applicable because “crack in reality does differ from cocaine powder,” notwithstanding similar medical effects and identical scientific composition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).