United States v. Calvin Lamar Bosby, Alan Maurice Ticey, and Charles F. Hill, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to consider an affidavit attached to a party’s brief because “[g]enerally, appellate courts will not consider matters outside the record,” and the party had not moved to supplement the record
• evidence admissible if discovered pursuant to inventory procedure, even though officer expected to find evidence
• although no delay issue was raised where inventory took place the day after impoundment, ensuring proper procedures in coordinated state and federal investigation may have sufficed as justification
• “[T]he mere expectation of uncovering evidence will not vitiate an otherwise valid inventory search.”
• interrogation immediately ceased, reinitiated two weeks later, after warnings were readministered
• as part of scheme to defraud banks and stores by depositing uncollectible checks and withdrawing funds before those checks were returned, use of mails to have personalized checks sent to local addresses to give the new accounts the appearance of legitimacy satisfied the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).