United States v. Calmes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that organization supporting California ballot measures to amend state constitution to define marriage as relationship between persons of opposite sex failed to show harassment and retaliation sufficient to justify exemption from public disclosure requirements
• rejecting an as-applied challenge to a disclosure law in part because many of the alleged incidents of “threats, harassment and reprisals . . . are themselves forms of speech protected by the United States Constitution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).