Skip to main content
· 8/15/2008

United States v. Calimlim

Citations

  • 538 F.3d 706
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 20058
  • 2008 WL 3563276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that § 1589(a)(4) contains a “second scienter requirement” 4 This conclusion is consistent with how we and the Fifth Circuit have treated the forced labor statute’s paragraphs. See Martinez-Rodriguez v. Giles, 31 F.4th 1139, 1150 (9th Cir. 2022

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Sykes, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.