United States v. Calderon-Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendants did not intend to be bound by a draft that “contained blank spaces” and was “facially incomplete”
• finding that there were several indications of the parties’ “intention not to be bound until [an] agreement was finalized and fully executed,” including that the relevant “document [wa]s prominently labeled ‘DRAFT’” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).