United States v. Cajado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Summary judgment is inappropriate . . . ‘where the agency’s response is patently incomplete, or where the agency’s response is for some other reason unsatisfactory.’”
• “Boolean operators[3] are also consequential: a search for ‘secure communities opt-out’ may yield no results while a search for ‘‘secure communities’ and ‘opt-out’’ yields ten thousand.”
• “Summary judgment is inappropriate where the agency’s response raises serious doubts as to the completeness of the agency’s search, where the agency’s response is patently incomplete, or where the agency’s response is for some other reason unsatisfactory.”
• “Summary judgment is inappropriate where the agency’s response raises serious doubts as to the completeness of the agency’s search, where the agency’s response is patently incomplete, or where the agency’s response is for some other reason unsatisfactory.”
• “The parties will need to agree on search terms and protocols.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).