Skip to main content
· 12/28/1984

United States v. Caceres-Prado

Citations

  • 601 F. Supp. 468
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20910

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • motion to dismiss raises question of law rather than fact, would be properly considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Laffitte

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.