United States v. Cabrera-Beltran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Court’s holding “relied heavily on the fact that the affidavits at issue were specifically created for trial purposes”
• noting that use of statements at trial does not mean they were created for trial
• “Even if [declarants] were aware that the prison was recording their conversation, a declarant’s understanding that a statement could potentially serve as criminal evidence does not necessarily denote ‘testimonial’ intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).