United States v. Busbin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• use of resale market to measure market price under U.C.C. Sec. 2-713 is inappropriate when no evidence was produced indicating that the plaintiff would have resorted to the resale market to cover
• use of resale market to measure market price under U.C.C. Sec. 2-713 is inappropriate when no evidence was produced indicating that the plaintiff would have resorted to the resale market to cover
• where discretion afforded United States under a contract, “exercise of that discretion must be fair and reasonable, not arbitrary and capricious”
• breach that deprived plaintiff of 6.5% of total contract not total breach when plaintiff already received 93.5% of bargained-for benefit
• refusal to extend contract held a breach where such extensions were shown to be a well-established practice or custom in those circumstances and consistent with Government regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).