United States v. Burtram Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that upward adjustment could not be based on “expenses associated with prosecuting [the] underlying perjury offense”
• defendant’s false grand jury testimony in Clean Water Act action resulted in substantial resources expended to interview additional witnesses and reconvene the grand jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).