· 10/13/2023
United States v. Buoi
Citations
- 84 F.4th 31
Oral argument
- ListenArgued30 min recording
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that facially neutral statute violated free exercise clause in part because of city council’s discriminatory motivation
- holding that facially neutral statute violated free exercise clause in part because of city council's discriminatory motivation
- holding that a “not-for-profit corporation organized under Florida law” prevailed on its Free Exercise claim
- holding that a “not-for-profit corporation organized under Florida law” prevailed on its Free Exercise claim
- concluding that Santeria, a hybrid African/Catholic faith mandating animal sacrifice, was a \religion\ meriting First Amendment protection based partly on the \historical association between animal sacrifice and religious worship\
- holding that a city ordinance was not neutral and restricted religious practice, and therefore was an unconstitutional violation of free exercise
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.