· 12/7/2015
United States v. Bukumirovic
Citations
- 624 F. App'x 96
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]here is no genuine dispute of material fact regarding Plaintiffs [sic] claims; thus, there is no underlying claim for the Court to adjudicate.”
- “[D]eclaratory judgment is merely a form of relief that a court may grant based on an underlying claim.”
- “Defendants correctly argue that the alleged promise to modify the note and delay foreclosure in the future is not a statement of existing fact.”
- “Plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge the assignments because they were not a party to those assignments.”
- mortgage servicer’s alleged oral promise to allow mortgagors to reinstate note by paying arrearage amount was barred by statute of frauds, where deed of trust and mortgage note did not require acceptance of any partial payments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Diaz, Niemeyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.