· 10/24/2017
United States v. Bucio-Martinez
Citations
- 699 F. App'x 358
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that opportunity to depose newly-identified witnesses cured surprise caused by late disclosure
- treating a plaintiff’s sex and racial discrimination claims “in tandem” because the plaintiff was discriminated against “as an African American female”
- treating the plaintiff’s sex and racial discrimination claims “in tandem” because the plaintiff was discriminated against “as an African-American female”
- rejecting argument that “an employer’s failure to investigate an alleged leak of purportedly private information constitutes an adverse employment action” because “a ‘failure’ of this sort does not tangibly affect the conditions of an employee’s employment”
- “Although there is no bright-line rule on the issue of temporal proximity, the Fourth Circuit has held that a lapse of over three months between the protected activity and the alleged retaliation is too long to give rise to an inference of causality.”
- stating elements' of “discharge on the basis of gender”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Higginson, King, Owen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.