Fifth Circuit· 11/10/1993
United States v. Buchner
Citations
- 7 F.3d 1149
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 29113
- 1993 WL 460236
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant, who was not an authorized driver of a rental car, had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the partially open shoulder bag he left on the front seat of the car
- finding the plaintiff “demonstrated irreparable 8 harm in the form of the loss of opportunity to pursue her chosen profession”
- noting “treatment records must be viewed in light of the 8 overall diagnostic record”
- defendant's bag was found in an empty car rented to defendant's girlfriend; it is unclear whether the girlfriend was present at the time of the search
- defendantâs bag was found in an empty car rented to defendantâs girlfriend; it is unclear whether the girlfriend was present at the time of the search
- \The owner of a suitcase located in another's car may have a legitimate expectation of privacy with respect to the contents of his suitcase.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garwood, Davis, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. McSweenFifth Circuit· 1995-05-22· cited 162×
- United States v. Diana Gonzales Buchanan, Fedell Anderson, Vernon Bonner, and John BuchananFifth Circuit· 1996-02-22· cited 153×
- United States v. JarasFifth Circuit· 1996-06-17· cited 105×
- United States v. EdwardsTenth Circuit· 2001-03-09· cited 92×
- United States v. Terry Ann DeischFifth Circuit· 1994-04-25· cited 74×
- Mack v. City of AbileneFifth Circuit· 2006-08-16· cited 49×
- United States v. WorthonTenth Circuit· 2008-04-01· cited 45×
- United States v. Joshua ConlanFifth Circuit· 2015-05-14· cited 44×
- United States v. HarrisonFifth Circuit· 1995-06-01· cited 37×
- United States v. William IrahetaFifth Circuit· 2014-08-19· cited 33×
- United States v. HareFifth Circuit· 1998-08-05· cited 31×
- United States v. Tomas Vente SinisterraFifth Circuit· 1996-02-21· cited 31×
- United States v. NedFifth Circuit· 2011-04-04· cited 28×
- United States v. Joe Willie McLaurin United States of America v. Joe Willie McLaurinNinth Circuit· 1995-06-14· cited 18×
- United States v. RodriguezFifth Circuit· 2022-05-13· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. OrtizMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2015-10-26· cited 10×
- People v. SoteloSupreme Court of Colorado· 2014-10-14· cited 9×
- United States v. Espinoza-SantillW.D. Texas· 1997-04-17· cited 8×
- United States v. De La Rosa-ValenzuelaW.D. Texas· 1997-11-24· cited 6×
- United States v. CrittendenFifth Circuit· 2022-08-18· cited 5×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court· 1991-06-03· cited 1,409×
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,390×
- Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-02-24· cited 600×
- United States v. GaddisSupreme Court· 1976-03-03· cited 209×
- United States v. Daniel Michael KelleyFifth Circuit· 1993-01-20· cited 198×
- United States v. Willie WhitakerD.C. Circuit· 1971-05-27· cited 182×
- United States v. Joseph Noel SealsFifth Circuit· 1993-03-24· cited 182×
- United States v. Ben Lee Basey, Armando Jose Lopez, and Oscar Quirarte Ponce, DefendantsFifth Circuit· 1987-05-28· cited 170×
- United States v. Andrew TsanasSecond Circuit· 1978-04-24· cited 141×
- United States v. Cecil Lovell JacksonNinth Circuit· 1984-03-02· cited 120×
- United States v. Geronimo Muniz-MelchorFifth Circuit· 1990-02-12· cited 113×
- United States v. Evelio Del ToroFifth Circuit· 1970-05-18· cited 44×
- United States v. Gina Antoinette BrownerFifth Circuit· 1991-07-23· cited 25×
Other cases named United States v. Buchner
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.