Skip to main content
· 10/19/2005

United States v. Bryson Jose Roberto A. Miguel

Citations

  • 425 F.3d 1237
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22441
  • 2005 WL 2656723

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that having “same offense” charges brought in one indictment “makes all the difference” because jeopardy may “continue” on one count even when there has been a terminating event as to the other count
  • “[W]hen a jury convicts on both the greater and lesser included offenses . . . the district court should enter a final judgment of conviction on the greater offense and vacate the conviction on the lesser offense.”
  • making essentially this same point

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Callahan, Bea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.