United States v. Bryant & Beinecke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that elimination of a department was a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason to terminate an employee even where some employees were retained on staff
• holding that Title VII and the ADEA exhibit similar language and are indeed “statutory kin”
• holding that statement by decision maker that “there comes a time when we have to make way for younger people” was not evidence of age discrimination
• holding that the statement that \there comes a time when we have to make way for younger people\ is insufficient to create any \inference of age bias\ because it is a stray remark which merely reflects a fact of life
• holding that the statement that “there comes a time when we have to make way for younger people” is insufficient to create any “inference of age bias” because it is a stray remark which merely reflects a fact of life
• holding that the statement that \there comes a time when we have to make way for younger people\ is insufficient to create any \inference of age bias\ because it is a stray remark which merely reflects a fact of life

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).