United States v. Bryan Ogle

Oral argument

• Argued

  36 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that under the federal lower-income housing assistance program, \the local governmental units retain the right to . . . require that zoning and other land use restrictions be adhered to by builders.\
• upholding metropolitan area remedy where Department of Housing and Urban Development had violated Constitution and federal statutes
• distinguishing Milliken I, in part, because prior cases had established that racial segregation in schools is “to be dealt with in terms of ‘an established geographic and administrative school system’ ”
• upholding region-wide remedy where HUD had been found to have violated the fifth amendment and Title VI by knowingly funding the Chicago Housing Authority’s discriminatory public housing program
• interpreting Milliken I, 418 U.S. 717, 94 S.Ct. 3112, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1974)
• sketching “basic limitations on the exercise of the equity power of the federal courts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).