Skip to main content
· 6/2/2003

United States v. Bruce Rhodes

Citations

  • 330 F.3d 949
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10912
  • 2003 WL 21256474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to set aside restitution amount “in the absence of any documented proof of miscalculation in the amount ordered”
  • “While for sentencing purposes ‘loss’ is defined as the greater of either the ‘actual’ or the ‘intended’ amount lost due to the fraud, see U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1, cmt. n.2 (2002

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Coffey, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.