· 6/2/2003
United States v. Bruce Rhodes
Citations
- 330 F.3d 949
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10912
- 2003 WL 21256474
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to set aside restitution amount “in the absence of any documented proof of miscalculation in the amount ordered”
- “While for sentencing purposes ‘loss’ is defined as the greater of either the ‘actual’ or the ‘intended’ amount lost due to the fraud, see U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1, cmt. n.2 (2002
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Coffey, Ripple
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.