United States v. Bruce Humphrey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant cited “no authority demonstrating ‘clear or obvious error’ that would support a claim of plain error on appeal” because Heller did not “cast doubt on the constitutionality of felon-in-possession statutes”
• noting that an objection to PSR's recommendation but not the underlying facts does not prevent district court from relying on PSR's factual findings
• “[U]nless a defendant objects to a specific factual allegation contained in the PSR, the court may accept that fact as true for sentencing purposes.” (quoting United States v. Arrieta-Buendia, 372 F.3d 953, 955 (8th Cir. 2004)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).