United States v. Bruce D. Ott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that FISA’s ex parte in camera proceedings did not violate due process, even though defense counsel had high security clearances
• holding that, in a mili- tary criminal trial, the government’s use of classified informa- tion, without permitting the defendant or his lawyers to view the information, did not violate the defendant’s due process rights
• defendant “can argue only that his own statutory rights [under FISA] were violated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).