United States v. Brow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statement of 16-year-old rape victim held admissible despite at least a 12-hour lapse between the rape and the statement
• statement of 16-year-old rape victim held admissible despite at least a 12-hour lapse between the rape and the statement
• statement made by a 13-year old 12 hours after the accused took indecent liberties with her and while the girl’s appearance and emotions were abnormal admissible
• victim’s “unsolicited” statements, given 12 hours after being sexually assaulted, were made at the first available opportunity while the victim’s demeanor was substantially different than normal and constituted an excited utterance
• victim was, simultaneously, “ ‘really agitated’ and ‘very, very subdued’ ”
• declarant’s motive questioned for asking such a thing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).