United States v. Brothers Construction Company of Ohio, Incorporated, United States of America v. Tri-State Asphalt Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that grand jury testimony of officer and in-house counsel for corporate defendant was properly admitted as admission against the corporate defendant
• holding that grand jury testimony of officer and in-house counsel for corporate defendant was properly admitted as admission against the corporate defendant
• holding that grand jury testimony of officer and in-house counsel for corpo- rate defendant was properly admitted as admission against the corpo- rate defendant
• noting that Brady applies to material evidence both that exculpates a defendant and that allows a defendant to impeach evidence presented against him
• upholding conviction of conspiracy to defraud United States in DBE fraud involving West Virginia Department of Transportation highway project
• rejecting claim that the imposition of a sentence under an improper guideline range necessarily affects a defendant’s substantial rights and requiring actual prejudice based on district court’s improper calculation of fine range

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).