United States v. Bronislaw Hajda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “if the [ancient] document contains more than one level of hearsay, an appropriate exception must be found for each level”
• “[If] the [ancient] document contains more than one level of hearsay, an 31 appropriate exception must be found for each level.”
• the admissibility exception applies only to the document itself; if a document contains more than one level of hearsay, an appropriate exception must be found for each level
• “These documents are more than 20 years old and they were properly authenticated, so they are exceptions to the hearsay rule admissible under Rule 803(16
• the admissibility exception applies only to the document itself; if a document contains more than one level of hearsay, an appropriate exception must be found for each level
• documents alleged identification card, and although the district court supported by testimony of sister and father in earlier trial primarily relied on the defendant’s fingerprint on the card, stating that defendant had served in the SS

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).