United States v. Broadhead
Citations
- 127 U.S. 212
- 8 S. Ct. 1191
- 32 L. Ed. 147
- 1888 U.S. LEXIS 1982
Syllabus
<p>On the authority of United States v. Hill, 123 U. S. 681, it is held, that an action 'against sureties to recover on a bail bond conditioned for the appearance of the principal to answer to an indictment for making and forging checks against an assistant treasurer is not a case for the enforcement of a revenue law, within the intent of Rev. Stat. § 699.</p> <p>No interest can be Recovered in an action by the United States upon a bail bond conditioned for the appearance of a person to answer to an indictment for forgery.</p>
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Northern Counties Trust v. SearsOregon Supreme Court· 1895-10-07· cited 57×
- Pueblo v. Martínez HernándezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2003-01-22· cited 11×
- State v. MorseNebraska Supreme Court· 1960-10-28· cited 4×
- Evans v. PringleCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1982-05-27· cited 3×
- El Pueblo De Puerto Rico v. Oscar Martinez Hernandez V.compañia De Fianzas De PrSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2003-01-22
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.