United States v. Bride

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the mere fact that “the parties to a plea agree- ment considered the Guidelines in recommending a sentence” does not make a sentence “based on” subsequently amended Guidelines ranges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Austin
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-04-18· cited 71×
• United States v. Tyrone Davis
  Ninth Circuit· 2016-06-13· cited 62×
• United States v. Berry
  D.C. Circuit· 2010-09-03· cited 53×
• United States v. Garcia
  Fifth Circuit· 2010-05-07· cited 26×
• United States v. Rivera-Martinez
  First Circuit· 2010-06-09· cited 24×
• United States v. Rivera-Martínez
  First Circuit· 2010-06-09· cited 12×
• United States v. Williams
  Fifth Circuit· 2010-06-15· cited 8×
• United States v. Tupuola
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-11-24· cited 5×
• United States v. Epps
  District of Columbia· 2010-12-23
• United States v. Epps
  District of Columbia· 2011-03-22
• United States v. Talatonu Tupuola
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-11-24
• United States v. Taylor
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-10-13
• United States v. Harris
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-12-14

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Booker
  Supreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
• United States v. Leniear
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-07-27· cited 162×
• United States v. Colson
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-07-23· cited 31×
• United States v. Rafael Pacheco-Navarette, United States of America v. Victor Alfonso Gomez-Vera
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-12-23· cited 27×
• United States v. Bride
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-01-07· cited 1×

Other cases named United States v. Bride

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• United States v. Bride
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-01-07· cited 1×