Skip to main content
· 3/24/1993

United States v. Brian R. Anderson

Citations

  • 989 F.2d 310
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2109
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 3739
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 5749
  • 1993 WL 80453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on a federal statute to determine federal common law because of the absence of a national consensus regarding the definition of extortion
  • considering whether there was an interstate consensus regarding the definition of extortion
  • deciding on the Hobbs Act definition
  • “[W]e must look to the ‘generic’ definitions of burglary, arson, or extortion—the meanings likely ascribed to these words by the federal legislators who adopted the stat- ute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tang, Kozinski, Fernandez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.