United States v. Brian Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a “victim’s perception . . . may be relevant” to whether the defendant “objective[ly]” created the impression of possessing a dangerous weapon (emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]he current version of the Commentary [regarding the dangerous-weapon enhancement] all but codifies the holding in United States v. Dixon[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).