Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Third Circuit· 7/29/1999

United States v. Brian Copenhaver

Citations

  • 185 F.3d 178
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 17873

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming physical restraint sentencing enhancement where victim was ordered into fireplace with movable screen and noting the significance of the screen in hindering victim's ability to move freely and observe events
  • defendant forced victim into fireplace and put screen in front of fireplace as a barrier to exit
  • “Cases have generally held that ‘physical restraint’ is not limited to the examples listed in the guidelines.”
  • “Cases have generally held that ‘physical restraint’ is not limited to the examples listed in the guidelines.”
  • “Cases have generally held that ‘physical restraint’ is not limited to the examples listed in the guidelines.”
  • “Cases have generally held that ‘physical restraint’ is not limited to the examples listed in the guidelines.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Nygaard, McKee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.