United States v. Brian A. Anderson, Richard Quentin Felts, and Paul William Spicer,defendants-Appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants had no standing because the defendants had “abandoned the luggage before the search took place” (emphasis added)
• warrantless search of checked luggage impermissible, where police have effective control over the movement of that luggage
• \a contemporaneous search of containers in the vehicle which could reasonably be employed in the illicit carriage of contraband is also constitutionally permissible.\
• “[T]he discovery of marijuana in the trunk of the car certainly provided probable cause for the arrest.”
• tipster's corroborated description of mode of operation to include rental of two cars, one for local and one for interstate use, \evinced a knowledge of the inner workings of the appellants' system\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).