United States v. Brent Vreeland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that monitoring of defendant on supervised release is not a “judicial proceeding” and, thus,' false statements to supervising probation officer are not exempt from prosecution under § 1001(b)
• rejecting Fifth Amendment claim when probation officer “did not threaten arrest or a supervised release violation” during meeting
• false statements to supervising probation officer justify revocation
• interview at probation office not custodial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).