United States v. Brennick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Congress had expressed its will \in reasonably plain terms\ that S 6531(4) applies only to single offense described in S 7203
• adopting Workinger and holding that parenthetical language in § 6531(6) is descriptive rather than limiting, and holding that the statute of limitations for § 7212(a
• adopting Workinger and holding that parenthetical language in § 6531(6) is descriptive rather than limiting, and holding that the statute of limitations for § 7212(a
• adopting Workinger and holding that parenthetical language in § 6531(6) is descriptive rather than limiting, and holding that the statute of limitations for § 7212(a
• “[T]he ultimate meaning of these words depends on the context in which they are used.”
• 23% tax penalty for failure to truthfully account for and pay federal income taxes was not punishment for double jeopardy purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).